[A1109] By contrast, the immediate advantages of a composition course set on an experimental basis are all too obvious. Difficult to study 'normal', which focuses on learning Western music at its highest level of development, could give in a few months the results of compositional order, that is not limited to partial exploration of some components of the system ( elementary harmonic as links). In fact it takes several years for the rule of disparate acquisitions of various codes and rules will standardize on a combination of organic light musical communication, and even then this is for the most part as heteronomous overlay models without them being investigated, alongside systematic aspect, the self-organized. Unlike in the experimental course, which is precisely the relationship between codification and autostrutturazione what is primarily investigated, obviously examples where the debt to a 'system' is assessable - approximately - even in an analysis based on poor technical conditions. Therefore excluded, as areas of training, the phases of maximum systematic development (Flemish polyphony and sixteenth-century polyphony, baroque, nineteenth-century harmony, etc..) And limited choices in the sense here documented, the experience composition of participants in this first year was experimental space to investigate itself and on the necessity of referring to a 'system'. But it is clear that an investigation of this type, if it wants to avoid the danger of early academics and should wherever possible be based on research experience of a situation sufficiently systematic compositional internal organization evolved, and this is one of the largest difficulties, it seems, inherent in a trial conducted in large part on 'empty' technical. Individual success of this or that experiment, individual acquisitions speculation on what is music and what is its place in the world should not deceive the lability of the bases, sometimes dramatically developed in the theory and criticism, almost always, however, also conspicuously lacking in substantiality practice. This is indeed quite strange that it should come for so long (not less than seven years in the normal course) exercised in a context that language is no longer ours, it is questionable whether the bases of so laborious construction does not end up turn in the cage throughout the building and if that fact is far more dangerous than a first-stimulating inert non-transience.
0 comments:
Post a Comment